Now Showing on Cable: “Friends with Benefits”

20120319-151056.jpg

“Friends with Benefits” premiered this weekend on Starz. It’s last year’s romantic/sex comedy starring Mila Kunis and Justin Timberlake.

Kunis plays a professional head-hunter who successfully recruits a web editor (Justin Timberlake) for GQ magazine. As she’s the only person he knows in New York, the two stay connected even after the employment contract is finalized.

Each of them have recently experienced romantic difficulties and both are frustrated with the very concept of romance. Yet they both still pine for sex…

Whatsoever shall they do?

The movie opens with both Kunis and Timberlake suffering through fairly miserable break-ups (featuring fun cameos from Andy Samberg and Emma Stone). It sets the tone for why they’re each soured on the idea of romantic relationships. So when they begin to become friends, they each have an excuse to ignore the romantic possibilities. One night, however, their discussion leads to sex, and they wonder why it has to be burdened with emotional complications, etc.

It’s the age old, “why can’t people have sex, but just be friends” conundrum.

This leads to the two making an agreement to have sex, while remaining romantically unattached to each other. “Friends With Benefits”. Once the two begin hooking up, though, they find that the lack of emotional attachment actually improves the experience. Now that the fear of hurting the other person’s feelings is removed from the equation, they feel completely open about telling the other exactly what they want out of sex. What winds up happening is that they both teach each other how to be their ideal sexual partner… and of course, that leads to them hooking up even more frequently.

When the time comes to actually test the “we can still stay friends” aspect of the agreement by starting to date other people, however, the flaws in the plan begin to show. They realize that they’ve actually begun developing feelings for each other. Of course this leads to gross overreactions on both of their parts, as they push each other away in continued denial of their own feelings.

There’s a couple of gags here that don’t really work for me, and an ancillary character or two the movie would probably be better off without. Although Woody Harrelson was really funny as Timberlake’s gay co-worker.

For the most part, though, the jokes are really funny and Kunis and Timberlake play off of each other really well. Kunis, especially, is fantastic here. It’s also not quite just your standard rom-com as the sexual aspect of the scenario leads to plenty of sexual humor. At the end of the day, it IS a rom-com, with Kunis and Timberlake fighting through their own baggage in a “Their own worst enemy” kind of way before finally coming to grips… But I enjoyed it well enough.

More Com than Rom, plus plenty of dirty jokes along the way!

B

About these ads

17 thoughts on “Now Showing on Cable: “Friends with Benefits”

  1. Saw it yesterday. It was ok. These flicks are pretty predictable and this one was no different. Not much here other than the typical chick flick. With that said, it did have its funny parts and Woody did a good job at his part. I’m not much of a Woody Harrison fan but, I did like him in this one. I would have just gone a little lower on the grade, C+ or B-.

    • Yeah, I probably shoulda B minused it, but I dont know, maybe it caught me in a good mood or something.

      Plus I’m happy to show off that I can enjoy a chick flick now and then now that Im a more open minded movie blogger. LOL!!!

  2. Got this movie but haven’t watched it yet. I must be in the mood for a “chick flick” :) Thanks for sharing. :)

    • It was definitely chick flick-ish (TRIPLE Rhyme Score!) but not entirely. There’s a lot of semi-crude sex humor that adds some across the board appeal. It wasn’t totally just straight up rom-com, although it’s definitely MAINLY rom-com.

      Now that you have that explained way more than you needed, hope you have fun watching it, it wasnt bad! LOL

  3. I thought this was pretty good. There was a good deal of humour. I’ve seen a lot worse than this, mostly with a certain Ms Anniston. Woody Harrelson kinda stole it though. He was excellent

  4. I didn’t like this as much as I wanted.I think one of the issues I had was that I just don’t buy Justin Timberlake as an actor. His character felt shallow and with little moral complexity. Pretty typical chick flick in that you want it to cut to the chase because you can see everything coming from 12 miles away.

    • You know, there’s really nothing I can say to counter that, nor do I feel strongly enough about this flick to leap to its defense.

      I will say that the one thing for me that offset your points was the humor. I found myself laughing often enough to overcome the trite moments and predicitibility.

      You’re not wrong though Cap…

  5. A fair review. You know, I actually liked this one. I went in with low expectations and was surprised at myself at the end. I actually bought into the story a bit and could see it playing out in real life the way it did (except for a few things like the flashmobs, Woody Harrelson, etc).

    All in all, I’d say it gets a “B” from me too. wasn’t much in it for me to hate and it was an enjoyable watch.

  6. It would’ve been nice if (spoiler… I guess) the film didn’t follow the same stock clichés as every other romcom, but I suppose this journey was more enjoyable than others, given that the destination is always the same. The chemistry between Timberlake and Kunis is definitely whats worth watching in the end though. Good review Fogs.

Join in the discussion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s