Now Showing on Cable: “Mr. Popper’s Penguins”

20120603-150550.jpg

This weekend’s big premiere on HBO was last year’s “Mr Popper’s Penguins”.

Loosely based on a children’s book from 1938, “Mr Popper’s Penguins” stars Jim Carrey as a workaholic, divorced father of two who suddenly inherits a small colony of penguins when his long estranged father passes away. Having a batch of penguins around is an inconvenient challenge, and the birds interfere both with his work and his living situation.

But the one thing they do for him is they begin to reconnect him with his family.

Aimed squarely at families, “Popper’s” isn’t a complex film by any means. Neither is it Jim Carrey’s finest hour. But taken for what it is, it’s not the worst movie ever, either.

Carrey plays Tom Popper Jr., a real estate shark who specializes in acquiring high profile properties. Neglected by his globe-trotting father growing up, he finds he’s become an absentee father himself. He only spends every other weekend with his children, who, unsurprisingly, are distant. He’s a smarmy, glib, unlikeable used car salesman… your typical starting point for a Jim Carrey character.

When his long estranged father passes away, Popper receives a crate containing what appears to be a cryogenically frozen penguin. When he removes the bird from the crate, however, it turns out to be alive. Franticly placing a call to the source of the crate in an attempt to return the bird, he instead winds up accidentally ordering more penguins. He soon has six birds in all, and as you can imagine they’re difficult to handle. Compounding matters, the birds have imprinted on him. They now attempt to follow him wherever he goes.

The birds, however, enthrall his children. The two of them now enjoy spending time with their father more than they had previously. As a result, he begins to reconnect – not only with them, but with his ex-wife. As a result, Popper grows very protective of the birds. He finds it a struggle to keep them secret, and to keep them out of the hands of a zealous zookeeper. With the bond strengthening between him and children though, Popper has the motivation to do what needs to be done.

Jim Carrey is up to his old schtick here, albeit a toned down version of his old schtick. The movie is, as expected, sanitized and safe for family viewing. It’s innocuous. But it’s not without occasional moments of mild humor. It’s a family film, so we’re dealing with jokes and gags aimed at seven or eight year olds, a plot that’s really basic, and characters painted in the broadest of strokes. Yet it wasn’t as nauseating as the marketing focused on the dancing penguins might have indicated (although, admittedly, that still leaves a lot of room). Carrey’s an entertaining guy, even if this film did make me wish he was doing better movies.

Silly, saccharine, safe and standardized, “Mr Popper’s Penguins” is a run of the mill “cute animals” movie featuring Jim Carrey doing a “Jim Carrey Lite” act. It’s nothing I’d recommend, but if you get stuck watching it with some children, you won’t have to keep sharp objects out of your own reach, either.

C

About these ads

10 thoughts on “Now Showing on Cable: “Mr. Popper’s Penguins”

  1. I’m in your camp Fogs with maybe a hair higher as B- and squarely targeting this Penguins film as a safe movie to see with young kids. As a Carrey fan, I enjoyed this film as light fare even though it’s the tip of the iceberg for Jim’s talents. Nice post. ;-)

    • I was almost tempted, I’ll actually give you that. I was mildly entertained. :D It seemed really really bad from the marketing, and I was even kind of irritated over the fact that this was HBO’s Big offering.

      Wasn’t all that terrible though, I enjoyed it. Carrey kind of kept it toned down a little, he wasn’t too over the top.

      I wish he’d get some good projects again. You know?

  2. I’m a huge Jim Carrey fan, but I feel like, lately, he’s been phoning it in. So I haven’t seen this movie yet because I didn’t want to be disappointed. Now that my expectations are lower, I think I’ll check it out, because you make it sound like its not that terrible. Great review!

    • You know, Mark, in this one I didnt feel so much that he was phoning it in as he was holding back.

      If youre really a huge JC fan, this might wind up being disappointing, I’m not sure.

      It’s harmless, let’s put it that way. It’s a family movie. No teeth, but it doesn’t suck, either. So… that’s where I stand on it

    • There you go, I was thinking that families would enjoy it, and seeing as its a family movie, it succeeds in its admittedly kind of low aims.

      He had two movies I really liked after Bruce Almighty, though. “Lemony Snickets” which I like quite a bit, and “Eternal Sunshine” which is just a great movie….

Join in the discussion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s